Tag Archives: health literacy

,

Meppelink, C.S., Van Weert, J.C.M., Brosius, A., & Smit, E.G. (2017). Dutch health websites and their ability to inform people with low health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling, 100, 2012-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.012

,

Stadtler, M., Winter, S., Scharrer, L., Thomm, E., Krämer, N., & Bromme, R. (2017). Selektion, Integration und Evaluation. Psychologische Rundschau, 68(3), 177–181. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000361

Vertrouw het internet (niet) – voorlichting werkt beter dan waarschuwing bij het inschatten van gezondheidswebsites

,

Winter, S., & Krämer, N.C. (2016). Who’s right: The author or the audience? Effects of user comments and ratings on the perception of online science articles. Communications – The European Journal of Communication Research, 41(3), 339-360. doi:10.1515/commun-2016-0008

,

Winter, S., Krämer, N.C., Rösner, L., & Neubaum, G. (2015). Don’t keep it (too) simple: How textual representations of scientific uncertainty affect laypersons’ attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(3), 251-272. doi: 10.1177/0261927X14555872

,

Krämer, N.C. & Winter, S. (2014). Selektion und Rezeption von wissenschaftsbezogenen Informationen aus dem Internet – Entwicklung eines theoretischen Modells und Implikationen für instruktionale Settings [Selection and processing of science-related online content – Development of a theoretical model and implications for instructional settings]. Unterrichtswissenschaft – Zeitschrift für Lernforschung, 42, 39–54. doi:109201401039

,

Winter, S., & Krämer, N.C. (2014). A question of credibility – Effects of source cues and recommendations on information selection on news sites and blogs. Communications – The European Journal of Communication Research, 39(4), 435-456. doi:10.1515/commun-2014-0020